Active & Collaborative Learning
Faculty Notes (of student responses) from the “NSSE Summit”
Which, if any, of these results surprise you and why? Can you think of situations you have experienced that demonstrate how/why the results on any individual items are higher or lower?--Work with other students in class surprisingly low . . . Philosphy, English classes do a lot of in-class small exercises.
--Interpretation of “in-class” an issue . . .
--American Literature—students teach the class . . .
--Small class sizes facilitate interaction
--Exercises in Labor Relations class . . .
--Professors give extra credit for community-based projects.
--Many professors encourage community projects . . .
--Group projects difficult in freshmen classes . . .
--Different majors require different levels of group activities . . .
--Works with other students –think would be higher:
--Seniors—not as convenient due to where we live vs. Freshmen
--Freshmen less focused
--Freshmen more involved in tutoring –seems it should be seniors!
--Get to know student in class—someone always willing to help
--Psychology and Education classes use groups
--Teacher sees how student is thinking and can help
--Peer interaction—peers can sometimes explain better
--Seniors higher in projects—do more! (To be expected)
In the classes in which you feel “engaged,” what’s happening? What are you doing? What is the faculty member doing?
--Teacher not lecturing;
--Engaged in collaborative experience.
--Teacher relates to events outside of class.
--If teachers are enthusiastic . . .the students get engaged
--Theatre classes—classes with Harmless—small class size really helps.
--Students are asked to formulate opinions in your own words . . .
--Smaller classes leads to engagement . . .
--Divided into groups, groups answered question, presented to class . . .
--When engaged, learning is easy, comes from each other, don’t realize we’re
learning—but we are!
--Irish Drama Class—Fr. Williams makes us be prepared. Keeps us on our toes .
. . brought in videos, music, pictures from Ireland . . .
--Teacher’s enthusiasm is infectious.
--Ethics and Environmental Ethics: formulation
of personal philosophy given class material . . .
--Professors who don’t criticize responses elicit more engagement.
--Hall/Sociology—allowed students to work out issue; he was facilitator
--Hager/Developmental and Experimental Psychology—do small groups—walks around and
will ask questions as facilitator
--Kobelja./Logic—small groups; Students
not afraid to put wrong answer
--Need respect from teacher
--Creative—in-class discussions
--Real life examples
--When professors aren’t intimidating
--Instructor gives points, then opens the class for discussion
How can faculty help you to become more engaged in your learning?
--Force students to speak out!
--Ask questions . . .
--Participation points . . .
--Let students rank each other on participation.
--Balance between lecture, discussion . . .
--Use case studies instead of asking questions.
--Relate to real world . . .
--Let discussion emerge among & between students . . .
--Relate subject to student/student level
--Need flowing lectures (don’t jump from one thing to another)
--Use ERes more/outlines (use to help study)
--Use e/mail more (teacher does not always put on syllabus)
--Give in/class assignments—see how student is following along
--Extra credit as method of improvement, although don’t give too much—balance
Can your group agree on one item that faculty and students should focus on for further discussion and improvement?
--Balance between lecture, discussion . . .
--Use case studies instead of asking questions.
--Relate to real world . . .
--Let discussion emerge among & between students
--Faculty
more approachable, more flexible to meet student needs (i.e. ERes): therefore:
student learns/faculty learns.